![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(by Monty and the Xiph.Org community)
Articles last month revealed that musician Neil Young and Apple's Steve Jobs discussed offering digital music downloads of 'uncompromised studio quality'. Much of the press and user commentary was particularly enthusiastic about the prospect of uncompressed 24 bit 192kHz downloads. 24/192 featured prominently in my own conversations with Mr. Young's group several months ago.
Unfortunately, there is no point to distributing music in 24-bit/192kHz format. Its playback fidelity is slightly inferior to 16/44.1 or 16/48, and it takes up 6 times the space.
If you just said 'Whaa?', you may want to read the whole article.
It's fairly long... but hearing, perception and fidelity are complicated topics. Shysters and charlatans exploit that nuance (and misunderstanding) to bilk unsuspecting consumers of their money, all the while convincing them they're paying for 'quality'.
Anyway, happy reading and comments welcome!
Re: Good Headphones?
Date: 2012-03-16 06:52 am (UTC)HeadRoom is one of the few dedicated headphone stores. I bought several headphones from HeadRoom. All of them delivered more or less as described on their site as far as I can tell. I have found no stores at all in my own country.
http://www.headphone.com/selection-guide/ - HeadRoom.
Re: Good Headphones?
Date: 2012-05-28 10:22 pm (UTC)Re: Good Headphones?
Date: 2012-08-05 12:03 pm (UTC)...more than half of whom would then complain about the sound quality.
Re: Good Headphones?
Date: 2012-08-03 05:52 pm (UTC)Re: Good Headphones?
Date: 2012-08-05 12:02 pm (UTC)Personally, I wish they gave more information about their testing methodologies and raw data...