According to the license terms summary I linked, you're right. Interestingly, other licensing experts proofed my post before it went up, and they didn't mention any mistake. I'm following up with them now to confirm the error, and I'll correct the post promptly once I'm sure. [edit: post corrected]
Re: MPEG-LA licences "codecs"
Date: 2013-10-30 03:08 pm (UTC)